Skip to content Skip to footer

TOPICkle

Indian Copyright Law and Generative AI: Part 2 – Transformative and Extractive Use
This article has been written by Sneha Jain & Akshat Agrawal. Having first considered the question of whether storing copyrightable works for training purposes is reproduction that amounts to copyright infringement under Section 51 of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957, in this second post of this series we will specifically be looking at transformative and extractive uses, applicability…
In Pursuit of Fairness: Delhi High Court’s Do’s and Don’ts for SEP Negotiations
This article has been written by Julien George & Subhoshree Sil. Introduction: SEP jurisprudence, evolving across multiple jurisdictions, consistently underscores the paramount importance of “Fairness” in all dealings ensuing in a FRAND negotiation. Indeed, the concept of ‘good-faith’ negotiations between SEP Holders and Implementers is acquiring increasing significance, as evidenced by the imposition of elevated royalty rates…
Indian Copyright Law and Generative AI
This article has been written by Sneha Jain & Akshat Agrawal. The scope of copyright liability of Generative AI (‘genAI’) models is a hot topic globally. Copyright issues that stem out of genAI technology can be categorized into four heads. All the litigations in the United States form a part of one of these four…
Innovation of ‘Zero Period’ in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
This article has been written by Samriddh Bindal. The preamble of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (‘Code’) states its objectives, which are maximisation of value of assets, promote entrepreneurship, within the stipulate time frame. Apart from the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Professional (‘CIRP’) or the Liquidation Process, the Code also provides for a…
Delhi High Court renders its first SEP decision for Telecommunication Standards in the Ericsson v Lava case 
This article has been written by Julien George, Anu Paarcha & Subhoshree Sil. On 28th March 2024, the Delhi High Court (DHC) pronounced its final judgment[i] in the cross-suits filed between Ericsson and Lava, ultimately deciding the matter in favour of Ericsson by granting it damages to the tune of INR 244 Crores (USD 29.9 Million) along with legal…
Royal Tryst with Trademark Law
Royal Symbols often include the royal coat of arms, royal crest, insignias, badges etc., they are distinguishing marks or sign adopted by a person, a family, or an organization. Most of the Royal Symbols date back to medieval times. These Royal Symbols have been used for identification of knights in battles and kingdoms through the…

© 2025 Law Pickle. All Rights Reserved.

Sign Up to Our Newsletter

Be the first to know the latest updates